Curate your portfolio — quality over quantity
The portfolio is your primary evidence. Select three to five works or projects that best demonstrate your artistic quality, significance, and range. For each work, provide: (a) the work itself or high-quality documentation of it (images, recordings, published texts, screeners, or links to streamed performances); (b) contextual information — venue, commissioner, co-creators, date, audience size if applicable; (c) critical or curatorial response — reviews, catalogue essays, press coverage, or jury citations.
Resist the temptation to include everything. A portfolio of fifteen mediocre works is weaker than one of five excellent ones. The panel is expert: they will know whether the venues, publishers, or festivals you name are significant. Include only work you are genuinely proud of and that is supported by independently verifiable context.
Documentation quality matters enormously. A low-resolution photograph of an installation, a corrupted video file of a performance, or a poorly typeset PDF of a published text can make the panel struggle to assess work that is genuinely excellent. Invest in professional photography for visual work, broadcast-quality video files for performance and moving image, and clean formatted PDFs for text. For work that is available online — published articles, streamed performances, released recordings — ensure all links are functional at the time of submission.
For each work in your portfolio, write one short paragraph (100–150 words) of contextual annotation: what was the occasion or commission, who was the presenting or publishing institution, what was the critical or public response, and why does this work matter to the case you're making. Panels read hundreds of applications; they cannot be expected to infer the significance of a venue they don't immediately recognise. A work shown at Documenta requires no explanation; a work shown at a mid-tier regional gallery needs a sentence of context.