compare_my_chances
Free MCP tool.

Assesses how a draft UK Global Talent profile maps to the four criteria and returns a candid readiness verdict, per-criterion grades, the single biggest gap, and a prioritised list of next steps — more verbose and action-oriented than score_draft.

“I can assess how ready your UK Global Talent profile is — a candid verdict, per-criterion grades, your biggest gap, and a prioritised action plan, not just a score.”

Connect a client — 2 min See setup for Claude, ChatGPT & more

N° 01

When an agent reaches for this tool.

CASE · 01

A user wants a candid read on whether they're ready to apply and what to fix first

CASE · 02

A user has a draft and wants an action plan ordered by leverage, not just a grade

CASE · 03

An assistant has gathered a user's profile and wants next-step recommendations to relay

Example prompts

“What are my chances and what should I fix first?”
“Assess my Global Talent profile and give me an action plan”
“Am I ready to apply, and where am I weakest?”

N° 02

Example call.

Request · JSON-RPC 2.0

{
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "id": 1,
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "name": "compare_my_chances",
    "arguments": {
      "form_data": {
        "fullName": "Priya R.",
        "cvText": "Staff ML engineer, 9y. Led ranking team of 12 at a UK fintech.",
        "awards": "Best Paper, NeurIPS 2023",
        "publications": "First author, 4 papers (ICML, NeurIPS)"
      },
      "route": "tech"
    }
  }
}

Response · tool result

{
  "content": [
    {
      "type": "text",
      "text": "# Your chances — Tech Nation (Digital Technology): B (74/100)\n\nA credible Exceptional Talent profile with strong Innovation evidence; Impact is the gap that holds the grade down.\n\n## Criterion-by-criterion\n- **C1 · Recognition** — B. One major award; add press or invited talks.\n- **C2 · Innovation** — A. Strong first-author publication record.\n- **C3 · Impact** — C. Roles described, but outcomes not quantified.\n- **C4 · Contribution** — B. Mentoring evident; make it attributable.\n\n## Biggest gap\nImpact — reviewers need measurable user/revenue/scale outcomes, not responsibilities.\n\n## Prioritised next steps\n1. Quantify the ranking work in numbers (users, revenue, latency) _(C3 · Impact)_ — turns a C into a B+.\n2. Secure one external press mention or invited talk _(C1 · Recognition)_.\n3. Document an attributable open-source or mentoring contribution _(C4 · Contribution)_.\n\nHonest assessment, not legal advice."
    }
  ]
}

Rate limit. compare_my_chances is backed by the shared free-tier model quota and the verbose per-applicant assessment is heavier than score_draft, so it is capped at 15 calls per IP per 24 hours. When the cap trips, the JSON-RPC error includes data.rate_limited=true and data.window_hours.

N° 03